Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-30
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh WG-30, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR400 was revealed 20 months before the WG-30 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR400 scores against the WG-30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Ricoh WG-30. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh WG-30
| EX-ZR400 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| WG-30 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2014 | January 2013 | More recent by 20 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh WG-30
| EX-ZR400 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 has external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh WG-30 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the WG-30.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and WG-30 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The photograph here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and WG-30.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures although you will want to take the production date of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 192 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 300 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $428 |