Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR400 was released 12 months before the WG-4 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-ZR400 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| WG-4 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-ZR400 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 offers physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the WG-4.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and WG-4 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at specs. The photograph here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and WG-4.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels so you can expect similar quality of pictures though you will want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR400 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (205g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography factors
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high max frames per second (30.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
offers tracking focus
better than average battery power (500 per charge)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (240 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography info
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
lighter than competitors in class (205g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
environment proof
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery pack (240 per charge)
does not offer selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-4
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
focusing manually
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
environment proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
bad battery pack (240 shots)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging info
Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging info
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (205g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic support
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 240 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $330 |