Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR400 was released 12 months prior to the WG-4 GPS which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-ZR400 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-ZR400
WG-4 GPS | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-ZR400 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the WG-4 GPS.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and WG-4 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The picture underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and WG-4 GPS.
To sum up, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of images though you should consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 235g (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 240 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $210 |