Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung CL80
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5500
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung CL80, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR400 was released 3 years later than the CL80 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR400 grades versus the CL80 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung CL80. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung CL80
EX-ZR400 | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Casio EX-ZR400
CL80 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.7" | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung CL80
EX-ZR400 | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 features outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung CL80 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the CL80.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and CL80 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The photograph below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and CL80.
As you can tell, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR400 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung CL80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung CL80 |
Also called | - | ST5500 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.7" |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $0 | $400 |