Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung HZ35W
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR400 was announced 2 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the HZ35W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung HZ35W
EX-ZR400 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | June 2010 | Fresher by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-ZR400
HZ35W | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | 461k | Clearer display (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung HZ35W
EX-ZR400 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the HZ35W.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and HZ35W is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and HZ35W.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to show extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR400 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also called | - | WB650 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $0 | $300 |