Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL102
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR400 was announced 4 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR400 scores versus the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR400 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 50 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| SL102 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR400 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung SL102 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the SL102.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and SL102 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The visual below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and SL102.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to deliver greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR400 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $130 |