Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung SL202, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR400 was brought out 4 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-ZR400 matches up vs the SL202 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung SL202
EX-ZR400 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | February 2009 | Fresher by 49 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-ZR400
SL202 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung SL202
EX-ZR400 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 provides external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the SL202.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and SL202.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to render greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR400 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung SL202 |
Also called as | - | PL50 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $140 |