Clicky

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released January 2013
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Additionally Known as PL50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Here is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung SL202, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-ZR400 was brought out 4 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-ZR400 matches up vs the SL202 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung SL202

 EX-ZR400 SL202 
ReleasedJanuary 2013February 2009Fresher by 49 months
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution461k230kClearer display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-ZR400

 SL202 EX-ZR400 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung SL202

 EX-ZR400 SL202 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 provides external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the SL202.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and SL202.

As you can see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to render greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR400 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography features
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography features
40
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
25
has face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Sports photography camera
57
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast shooting (30.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
great battery life (500 per charge)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Travel photography highlights
71
great battery life (500 per charge)
lighter than competitors (205g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
57
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography information
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography information
52
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
great battery life (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
27
rather wide (28mm)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging features
Samsung SL202 Vlogging features
33
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone socket
27
rather wide (28mm)
has face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung SL202
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR400Samsung SL202
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 Samsung SL202
Also called as - PL50
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2013-01-29 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shutter rate 30.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 gr (0.45 pounds) 168 gr (0.37 pounds)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-130 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch price $0 $140