Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL620
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43


94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL65

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung SL620, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR400 was revealed 4 years later than the SL620 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the SL620 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung SL620. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung SL620
EX-ZR400 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 49 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-ZR400
SL620 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung SL620
EX-ZR400 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung SL620 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the SL620.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and SL620 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and SL620.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to render more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR400 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung SL620 |
Also Known as | - | PL65 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $200 |