Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST150F
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung ST150F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST150F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR400 was launched within a month of the ST150F which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the ST150F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST150F. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung ST150F
| EX-ZR400 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Casio EX-ZR400
| ST150F | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST150F
| EX-ZR400 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung ST150F has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST150F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the ST150F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and ST150F is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and ST150F.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of photographs though you should consider the release date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography details
Samsung ST150F Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
good megapixels (16MP)
provides face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Street photography camera
Samsung ST150F as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lighter than average in class (114 grams)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography information
Samsung ST150F Sports photography information
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
max fps high (30.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (500 per charge)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with Samsung ST150F
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than average in class (114g)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung ST150F Landscape photography highlights
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
better than average battery power (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
decently wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging advice
Samsung ST150F Vlogging advice
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic support
decently wide (25mm)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than average in class (114 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 114 gr (0.25 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $300 |