Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
98 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 87g - 82 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST30, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and ST30 (10MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and ST30 (1/3") posses different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR400 was announced 2 years after the ST30 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-ZR400 scores versus the ST30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung ST30. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung ST30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung ST30
| EX-ZR400 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2011 | More modern by 25 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST30 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| ST30 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST30
| EX-ZR400 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung ST30 has measurements of 82mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 87 grams (0.19 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the ST30.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and ST30 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The image underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and ST30.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR400 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Casio EX-ZR400 will produce greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST30 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 87 grams (0.19 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 82 x 52 x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $55 |