Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
98 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 87g - 82 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST30, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and ST30 (10MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and ST30 (1/3") posses different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR400 was announced 2 years after the ST30 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the EX-ZR400 scores versus the ST30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung ST30. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung ST30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung ST30
| EX-ZR400 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2011 | More modern by 25 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST30 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| ST30 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST30
| EX-ZR400 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung ST30 has measurements of 82mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 87 grams (0.19 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the ST30.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and ST30 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The image underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and ST30.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR400 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Casio EX-ZR400 will produce greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST30 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 87 grams (0.19 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 82 x 52 x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $55 |