Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST700
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
99 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST700 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST700, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is fairly similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled 2 years later than the ST700 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST700 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the ST700 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST700. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung ST700
| EX-ZR400 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 26 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| ST700 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST700
| EX-ZR400 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST700 has specifications of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the ST700.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and ST700 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements just by going over specs. The graphic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and ST700.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of photos although you need to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent EX-ZR400 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $280 |