Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST90
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST90 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung ST90, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the ST90 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR400 was manufactured 2 years after the ST90 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-ZR400 grades versus the ST90 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST90 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung ST90. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung ST90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung ST90
| EX-ZR400 | ST90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 25 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST90 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| ST90 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST90
| EX-ZR400 | ST90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST90 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung ST90 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung ST90 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR400 compared to the ST90.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and ST90 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST90 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and ST90.
As you can see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to result in more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR400 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST90 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST90 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST90 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | $150 |