Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST95
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung ST95, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR400 was introduced 2 years later than the ST95 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST95. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung ST95
| EX-ZR400 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 25 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| ST95 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST95
| EX-ZR400 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung ST95 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the ST95.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and ST95 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and ST95.
As you can see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of photos but you should always consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more modern EX-ZR400 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST95 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $145 |
