Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL100
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released January 2009
- Other Name is ST50
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL100 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung TL100, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and TL100 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR400 was manufactured 4 years after the TL100 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the TL100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung TL100. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung TL100
EX-ZR400 | TL100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 50 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Casio EX-ZR400
TL100 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL100
EX-ZR400 | TL100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 has outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung TL100 has proportions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung TL100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the TL100.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and TL100 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and TL100.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR400 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL100 |
Also called as | - | ST50 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 219 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $0 | $22 |