Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR400/Casio-EX-ZR400-front.jpg)
![Samsung TL205 front Samsung TL205 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-TL205/Samsung-TL205-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as PL100
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL205, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and TL205 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR400 was manufactured 3 years later than the TL205 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the TL205 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung TL205. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung TL205
EX-ZR400 | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 38 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Casio EX-ZR400
TL205 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL205
EX-ZR400 | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 offers external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL205 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the TL205.
![Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR400-vs-Samsung-TL205-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and TL205 is 92 and 94 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR400-vs-Samsung-TL205-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The graphic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and TL205.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to show more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR400-vs-Samsung-TL205-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR400-vs-Samsung-TL205-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/greggs-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL205 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL205 |
Also Known as | - | PL100 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 177 grams (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $180 |