Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as PL100
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL205, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and TL205 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR400 was manufactured 3 years later than the TL205 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the TL205 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung TL205. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung TL205
| EX-ZR400 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 38 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| TL205 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL205
| EX-ZR400 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 offers external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL205 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL205 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the TL205.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and TL205 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The graphic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and TL205.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to show more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL205 |
| Also Known as | - | PL100 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 177 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $180 |