Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffbde/ffbdefa3dbaa016a21238d3a965f28734e1b3ffe" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c780/4c7803d7ef97099f59a984f593bafa5d4197373a" alt="Samsung TL225 front Samsung TL225 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Also Known as ST550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung TL225, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-ZR400 was introduced 3 years later than the TL225 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the TL225 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung TL225. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung TL225
EX-ZR400 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 43 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-ZR400
TL225 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL225
EX-ZR400 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung TL225 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the TL225.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0c9c/e0c9c0e81699863ca4ef33ac6c9e7eac3d5c005a" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and TL225 is 92 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02ad4/02ad45d41fa3623e85e0d0f436cba0744c5c79b2" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The graphic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and TL225.
All in all, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to render more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR400 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5afae/5afae48fad14ea47a9798ecf72ef4d3c70099491" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3b60/c3b60d0cd21a399ab17483c469b66d3d886f9f07" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL225 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung TL225 |
Also referred to as | - | ST550 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2009-08-13 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 187g (0.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $0 | $488 |