Clicky

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Introduced August 2009
  • Also Known as ST550
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung TL225, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-ZR400 was introduced 3 years later than the TL225 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the TL225 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung TL225

 EX-ZR400 TL225 
IntroducedJanuary 2013August 2009More recent by 43 months
Manual focus More exact focus

Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-ZR400

 TL225 EX-ZR400 
Display dimensions3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1152k461kClearer display (+691k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL225

 EX-ZR400 TL225 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung TL225 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the TL225.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and TL225 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The graphic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and TL225.

All in all, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to render more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR400 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Portrait photography camera
40
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
21
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Street photography with Samsung TL225
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
59
image stabilization (Optical)
boasts focus by touch
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
heavier than competition (187 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography features
Samsung TL225 Sports photography features
57
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast continuous shooting (30.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
great battery life (500 shots)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
27
image stabilization (Optical)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography details
Samsung TL225 Travel photography details
71
great battery life (500 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
59
boasts focus by touch
flash built-in
fairly wide (27mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (187 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung TL225 Landscape photography highlights
52
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
great battery life (500 shots)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
37
fairly wide (27mm)
big screen (3.5 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging features
Samsung TL225 Vlogging features
33
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone support
29
fairly wide (27mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic jack
heavier than competition (187g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung TL225
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR400Samsung TL225
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 Samsung TL225
Also referred to as - ST550
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Revealed 2013-01-29 2009-08-13
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of display 461 thousand dot 1,152 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 30.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.40 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205g (0.45 lb) 187g (0.41 lb)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-130 SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $0 $488