Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB1100F
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Released January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB1100F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB1100F (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR400 was brought out 11 months before the WB1100F and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 grades against the WB1100F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB1100F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB1100F
| EX-ZR400 | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Casio EX-ZR400
| WB1100F | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 11 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB1100F
| EX-ZR400 | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 provides outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB1100F has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") and a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB1100F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the WB1100F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and WB1100F is 92 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The image underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and WB1100F.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels and you should expect similar quality of images however you have to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR400 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB1100F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB1100F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 512g (1.13 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $250 |