Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB150F
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is relatively similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR400 was announced 13 months later than the WB150F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR400 scores vs the WB150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-ZR400 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 13 months |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-ZR400
| WB150F | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-ZR400 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 features physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung WB150F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the WB150F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and WB150F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specs. The graphic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and WB150F.
All in all, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to deliver greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR400 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Portrait photography with Samsung WB150F
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
has manual focus
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography information
Samsung WB150F Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (188g)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Sports photography with Samsung WB150F
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high fps (30.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
provides tracking focus
great battery (500 per charge)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB150F Travel photography factors
great battery (500 shots)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition in class (188g)
decent megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (432mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB150F Landscape photography highlights
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
great battery (500 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB150F as a Vlogging camera
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of mic jack
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (188g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB150F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 188 gr (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $0 | $230 |
