Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB210
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled 19 months later than the WB210 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the WB210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB210. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB210
EX-ZR400 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | July 2011 | More recent by 19 months | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 1k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-ZR400
WB210 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB210
EX-ZR400 | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB210 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the WB210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and WB210 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The visual below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and WB210.
Clearly, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to show more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR400 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB210 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 174g (0.38 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $279 |