Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB2200F
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR400 was revealed 11 months prior to the WB2200F so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-ZR400 scores against the WB2200F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB2200F
| EX-ZR400 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-ZR400
| WB2200F | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 11 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB2200F
| EX-ZR400 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has proportions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB2200F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the WB2200F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and WB2200F is 92 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing a spec sheet. The image below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and WB2200F.
Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution so you should expect comparable quality of files although you might want to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography factors
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (708 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB2200F Sports photography highlights
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high max frames per second (30.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
better than average battery (500 per charge)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
incredible zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with Samsung WB2200F
better than average battery (500 shots)
lighter than average in class (205g)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (20mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (708 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography details
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
better than average battery (500 CIPA)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
manual focus
pretty wide (20mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging information
Samsung WB2200F Vlogging information
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone port
pretty wide (20mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (708g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 708 grams (1.56 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $599 |