Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB250F
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Portability
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled very close to the WB250F so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the WB250F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR400 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-ZR400
| WB250F | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR400 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 provides external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB250F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR400 compared to the WB250F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and WB250F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and WB250F.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to show extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Portrait photography with Samsung WB250F
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16MP)
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography information
Samsung WB250F Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (226g)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography information
Samsung WB250F Sports photography information
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast shooting (30.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
great battery pack (500 shots)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
incredible zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
supports tracking autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography information
Samsung WB250F Travel photography information
great battery pack (500 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition (226g)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (432mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Landscape photography with Samsung WB250F
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
great battery pack (500 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB250F as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone socket
really wide (24mm)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (226 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $250 |