Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB50F
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Here is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR400 was introduced 11 months prior to the WB50F so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the WB50F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB50F
EX-ZR400 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-ZR400
WB50F | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | January 2013 | Fresher by 11 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB50F
EX-ZR400 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 features outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung WB50F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the WB50F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and WB50F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by checking specs. The visual here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and WB50F.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels so you can expect similar quality of pictures but you should always consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB50F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 207g (0.46 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $0 | $180 |