Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffbde/ffbdefa3dbaa016a21238d3a965f28734e1b3ffe" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ffbf/8ffbfe3afe95f82bce5cd4eb18742effc86c819c" alt="Samsung WB750 front Samsung WB750 front"
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced September 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-ZR400 was launched 18 months after the WB750 making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 grades versus the WB750 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB750. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB750
EX-ZR400 | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | Newer by 18 months |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Casio EX-ZR400
WB750 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB750
EX-ZR400 | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 has physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB750 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the WB750.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc42c/bc42c0a78a233562b60f3b88d3c9492742151be7" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and WB750 is 92 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6d43/d6d43d5a122895965a79fde580007e3733b1ba75" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The picture underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and WB750.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to show greater detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR400 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd1d5/dd1d501453633d97899e9fb00dfea859b5e08e4f" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95a5a/95a5ac4107884fe1c3dc53c0a9e8a07b54d7f4a5" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB750 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB750 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4096 x 3072 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $339 |