Clicky

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced January 2013
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-ZR400 was announced very close to the WB800F and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR400 scores vs the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB800F

          

          

            
 EX-ZR400 WB800F 
Display resolution461k460kSharper display (+1k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-ZR400

          

          

            
 WB800F EX-ZR400 
Touch friendly display  Easily navigate
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB800F

          

          

            
 EX-ZR400 WB800F 
ReleasedJanuary 2013January 2013Similar age
Manually focus  Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 has outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the WB800F.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specs. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels and you can expect similar quality of images but you have to take the age  of the products into consideration.

            Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography info
39
 you can focus manually
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 external flash not possible
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
43
 manual focus
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 has face detection focusing
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary
Street Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Street photography with Samsung WB800F
62
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average (205 grams)
 fixed screen
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
62
 image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than others (218 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR400 as a Sports photography camera
 Samsung WB800F as a Sports photography camera
57
 long zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 fast shooting (30.0 fps)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 includes tracking focus
 great battery pack (500 per charge)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
52
 long zoom range (23-483mm  21.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 has tracking autofocus
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography features
Samsung WB800F Travel photography features
71
 great battery pack (500 per charge)
 lighter than average (205g)
 decent sensor resolution (16MP)
 flash built-in
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 long zoom (300mm)
 missing Timelapse mode
 does not feature selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
69
 lighter than others (218 grams)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (23mm)
 very long reach (483mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse function
 display is not selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography highlights
52
 you can focus manually
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 great battery pack (500 CIPA)
 cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 missing Timelapse mode
49
 manual focus
 fairly wide (23mm)
 screen is a good size (3")
 image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
 doesn't have Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB800F Vlogging highlights
33
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 lighter than average (205g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 does not feature selfie friendly screen
 missing microphone jack
35
 fairly wide (23mm)
 touchscreen enabled
 image stabilization (Optical)
 has face detection focusing
 high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than others (218 grams)
 sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
 display is not selfie friendly
 doesn't have external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB800F
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR400Samsung WB800F
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 Samsung WB800F
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-01-29 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 461 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 30.0fps -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 4.70 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 205 grams (0.45 lb) 218 grams (0.48 lb)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $0 $300