Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR400 was announced very close to the WB800F and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR400 scores vs the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR400 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-ZR400
| WB800F | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-ZR400 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 has outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the WB800F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specs. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels and you can expect similar quality of images but you have to take the age of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography info
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Street photography with Samsung WB800F
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (218 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Sports photography camera
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast shooting (30.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
great battery pack (500 per charge)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography features
Samsung WB800F Travel photography features
great battery pack (500 per charge)
lighter than average (205g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
missing Timelapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than others (218 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography highlights
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
great battery pack (500 CIPA)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
manual focus
fairly wide (23mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB800F Vlogging highlights
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (205g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
missing microphone jack
fairly wide (23mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (218 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $300 |
