Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Push to 1600)
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched March 2004
- Succeeded the Sigma SD9
- Updated by Sigma SD14
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sigma SD10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR400 was brought out 8 years after the SD10 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the SD10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Sigma SD10. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Sigma SD10
| EX-ZR400 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | March 2004 | Newer by 108 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 130k | Clearer screen (+331k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| SD10 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sigma SD10
| EX-ZR400 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 has external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sigma SD10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the SD10.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and SD10 is 92 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The picture here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and SD10.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR400 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR400 will produce greater detail having its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sigma SD10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 3MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 1.8" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 130k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $198 |