Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Push to 1600)
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched March 2004
- Succeeded the Sigma SD9
- Updated by Sigma SD14
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sigma SD10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR400 was brought out 8 years after the SD10 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the SD10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Sigma SD10. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Sigma SD10
| EX-ZR400 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | March 2004 | Newer by 108 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 130k | Clearer screen (+331k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| SD10 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sigma SD10
| EX-ZR400 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 has external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sigma SD10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the SD10.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and SD10 is 92 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The picture here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and SD10.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR400 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR400 will produce greater detail having its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sigma SD10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 3MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 1.8" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 130k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $198 |