Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma fp
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Released July 2019
- Replacement is Sigma fp L
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma fp Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma fp, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and fp (25MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) use totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled 7 years prior to the fp and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the fp in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma fp Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Sigma fp. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Sigma fp
EX-ZR400 | fp |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Casio EX-ZR400
fp | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2019 | January 2013 | More recent by 78 months | |
Screen sizing | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 2100k | 461k | Sharper screen (+1639k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sigma fp
EX-ZR400 | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 features outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sigma fp has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma fp in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the fp.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and fp is 92 and 84 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specs. The graphic below may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and fp.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR400 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma fp will offer extra detail having an extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The older EX-ZR400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sigma fp Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sigma fp |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2019-07-11 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Leica L |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 30 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.2" |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 2,100k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 422g (0.93 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $0 | $2,050 |