Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony H300
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony H300 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
Sony H300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Launched February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony H300 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sony H300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the H300 (20MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR400 was brought out 12 months earlier than the H300 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-ZR400 scores against the H300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony H300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Sony H300
| EX-ZR400 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| H300 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sony H300
| EX-ZR400 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony H300 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") accompanied by a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sony H300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the H300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and H300 is 92 and 63 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The photograph below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and H300.
As you have seen, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony H300 to show greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-ZR400 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony H300 as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
no manual focus
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography details
Sony H300 Street photography details
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205g)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (590 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography highlights
Sony H300 Sports photography highlights
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
max frames per second high (30.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery (500 CIPA)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Travel photography camera
Sony H300 as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery (500 CIPA)
lighter than average (205g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (875mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (590g)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Landscape photography with Sony H300
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
better than average battery (500 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
pretty wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging factors
Sony H300 Vlogging factors
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (205 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic socket
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than competitors in class (590g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony H300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 590g (1.30 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $249 |