Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony S2000
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Announced January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony S2000 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony S2000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and S2000 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled 3 years after the S2000 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the S2000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Sony S2000
| EX-ZR400 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 38 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| S2000 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sony S2000
| EX-ZR400 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony S2000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the S2000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and S2000 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The image below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and S2000.
As you have seen, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to deliver extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR400 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 1s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $225 |