Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony T900
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43


96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony T900 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR400 was announced 4 years after the T900 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Sony T900
EX-ZR400 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 49 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Casio EX-ZR400
T900 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sony T900
EX-ZR400 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the T900.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and T900 is 92 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The pic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and T900.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to render extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR400 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $300 |