Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony WX500
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
91 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony WX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 236g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Released April 2015
- Replaced the Sony WX350
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony WX500 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sony WX500, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the WX500 (18MP) is very similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR400 was announced 3 years earlier than the WX500 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the WX500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony WX500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Sony WX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Sony WX500
| EX-ZR400 | WX500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony WX500 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| WX500 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 26 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sony WX500
| EX-ZR400 | WX500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony WX500 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony WX500 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR400 and Sony WX500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the WX500.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and WX500 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony WX500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and WX500.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Sony WX500 to offer you more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The older EX-ZR400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony WX500 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Sony WX500 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2015-04-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 236 grams (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 360 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $348 |
