Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S4200
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S4200 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
Fujifilm S4200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S4200 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm S4200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the Fujifilm S4200 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR700 was released 13 months later than the Fujifilm S4200 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S4200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the Fujifilm S4200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S4200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Fujifilm FinePix S4200. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Fujifilm S4200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Fujifilm S4200
| EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm S4200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4200 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| Fujifilm S4200 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm S4200
| EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm S4200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S4200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR700 comes with outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Fujifilm S4200 has sizing of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") having a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm S4200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the Fujifilm S4200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm S4200 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S4200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizing only by researching a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm S4200.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR700 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S4200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm S4200 as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes face detect focusing
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
decent MP (14MP)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Street photography camera
Fujifilm S4200 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than average (543g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography advice
Fujifilm S4200 Sports photography advice
great zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
better than average battery pack (470 per charge)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
great zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
low fps (1.0 frames per second)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Travel photography with Fujifilm S4200
better than average battery pack (470 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (576mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than average (543 grams)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S4200
manual focus
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
better than average battery pack (470 CIPA)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging details
Fujifilm S4200 Vlogging details
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (222g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
missing mic jack
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic port
heavier than average (543g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S4200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm FinePix S4200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-576mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 543 gr (1.20 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $370 | $200 |