Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S9200
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Fujifilm S9200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR700 was introduced 11 months before the Fujifilm S9200 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the Fujifilm S9200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S9200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm FinePix S9200. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Fujifilm S9200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Fujifilm S9200
| EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| Fujifilm S9200 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 11 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm S9200
| EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Fujifilm S9200 has measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Fujifilm S9200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the Fujifilm S9200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm S9200 is 91 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The image here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm S9200.
To sum up, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of photos but you may want to take the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR700 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm S9200 as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
offers face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Street photography factors
Fujifilm S9200 Street photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (222g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography factors
Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography factors
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
supports tracking focus
great battery power (470 shots)
low fps (3.0 fps)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
excellent zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
great battery pack (500 per charge)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Travel photography camera
Fujifilm S9200 as a Travel photography camera
great battery power (470 per charge)
lighter than competitors (222g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
long zoom (450mm)
missing Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
great battery pack (500 per charge)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Landscape photography camera
Fujifilm S9200 as a Landscape photography camera
focusing manually
really wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
great battery power (470 shots)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Timelapse function
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
great battery pack (500 shots)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging features
Fujifilm S9200 Vlogging features
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (222 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone support
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | 500 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $370 | $300 |