Clicky

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm SL240

Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix SL240 front
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm SL240 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Fujifilm SL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 510g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
  • Released January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm SL240 Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Fujifilm SL240, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the Fujifilm SL240 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-ZR700 was manufactured 13 months later than the Fujifilm SL240 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm SL240 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR700 scores versus the Fujifilm SL240 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Fujifilm SL240

          

          

            
 EX-ZR700 Fujifilm SL240 
ReleasedJanuary 2013January 2012More recent by 13 months
Manually focus  More precise focusing
Display resolution922k460kClearer display (+462k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Fujifilm SL240 over the Casio EX-ZR700

          

          

            
 Fujifilm SL240 EX-ZR700 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm SL240

          

          

            
 EX-ZR700 Fujifilm SL240 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen  Neither has selfie screen
Touch display  Neither has Touch display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm SL240 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 has external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Fujifilm SL240 has specifications of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") having a weight of 510 grams (1.12 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Fujifilm SL240 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the Fujifilm SL240.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm SL240 size comparison
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm SL240 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm SL240 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm SL240 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
In many cases, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm SL240.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to result in greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR700 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

            Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm SL240 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm SL240 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm SL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR700 as a Portrait photography camera
 Fujifilm SL240 as a Portrait photography camera
43
 manual focus
 decent sensor resolution (16MP)
 supports face detection focusing
 cannot use external flash
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
38
 decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
 features face detect autofocus
 manual focus not available
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Street photography factors
Fujifilm SL240 Street photography factors
61
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (222g)
 screen is fixed
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
43
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 screen does not articulate
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
 more heavy than average (510g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR700 as a Sports photography camera
 Fujifilm SL240 as a Sports photography camera
50
 excellent zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 supports tracking autofocus
 better than average battery life (470 CIPA)
 very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect AF
47
 excellent zoom range (24-576mm  24.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
 features tracking focus
 slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Travel photography information
Fujifilm SL240 Travel photography information
70
 better than average battery life (470 shots)
 lighter than competition (222g)
 decent sensor resolution (16MP)
 built-in flash
 pretty wide (25mm)
 very long reach (450mm)
 missing Time Lapse mode
 does not have a selfie friendly screen
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
54
 decent sensor resolution (14MP)
 built-in flash
 pretty wide (24mm)
 great zoom (576mm)
 lack of Timelapse recording
 more heavy than average (510 grams)
 does not offer selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography advice
Fujifilm SL240 Landscape photography advice
51
 manual focus
 pretty wide (25mm)
 screen size is good (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 better than average battery life (470 shots)
 can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 missing Time Lapse mode
41
 pretty wide (24mm)
 screen is a decent size (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW support
 lack of Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR700 as a Vlogging camera
 Fujifilm SL240 as a Vlogging camera
34
 pretty wide (25mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detection focusing
 video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competition (222g)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 does not have a selfie friendly screen
 missing external mic socket
24
 pretty wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 features face detect autofocus
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 does not offer selfie friendly screen
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 lack of microphone socket
 more heavy than average (510 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm SL240 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm SL240
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR700Fujifilm FinePix SL240
General Information
Manufacturer Casio FujiFilm
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 Fujifilm FinePix SL240
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2013-01-29 2012-01-05
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 64
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
AF live view    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 24-576mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.1-5.9
Macro focus range 5cm 2cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 922 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT color LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 97%
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 4.70 m 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm�7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m�3.6 m)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 222 gr (0.49 pounds) 510 gr (1.12 pounds)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photos 300 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-130 NP-85
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $370 $280