Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm T400
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


93 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm T400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 159g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2012

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm T400 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm T400, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the Fujifilm T400 (16MP) is pretty comparable and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR700 was unveiled 13 months later than the Fujifilm T400 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR700 grades vs the Fujifilm T400 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm T400 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Fujifilm FinePix T400. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Fujifilm T400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Fujifilm T400
EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm T400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 13 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm T400 over the Casio EX-ZR700
Fujifilm T400 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm T400
EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm T400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm T400 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm T400 has measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm T400 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR700 compared to the Fujifilm T400.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm T400 is 91 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm T400 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The photograph below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and Fujifilm T400.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of files although you will need to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more modern EX-ZR700 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm T400 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Fujifilm T400 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm FinePix T400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Fujifilm FinePix T400 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3440 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.4-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 180 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | NP-45A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC / SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $370 | $150 |