Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z915
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Announced January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z915, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Kodak. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and Z915 (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR700 was revealed 4 years after the Z915 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-ZR700 grades versus the Z915 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Kodak EasyShare Z915. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR700 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 50 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| Z915 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Kodak Z915
| EX-ZR700 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has got outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Kodak Z915 has dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z915 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the Z915.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and Z915 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and Z915.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to result in extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $370 | $200 |