Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR700/Casio-EX-ZR700-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S100 front Nikon Coolpix S100 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S100/Nikon-S100-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.8) lens
- 175g - 99 x 65 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Nikon S100, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the S100 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR700 was launched 18 months later than the S100 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR700 grades vs the S100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Nikon Coolpix S100. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Nikon S100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Nikon S100
EX-ZR700 | S100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 18 months |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 820k | Crisper screen (+102k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S100 over the Casio EX-ZR700
S100 | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon S100
EX-ZR700 | S100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 features outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Nikon S100 has specifications of 99mm x 65mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.7") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Nikon S100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR700 compared to the S100.
![Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 size comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR700-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S100-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and S100 is 91 and 94 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR700-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S100-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and S100.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you should really consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The fresher EX-ZR700 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
![Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR700-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S100-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR700-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S100-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S100 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S100 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2011-08-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.9-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 820k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | Organic LED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 175 gr (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 99 x 65 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 150 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $370 | $240 |