Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S6200
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S6200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S6200 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon S6200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Nikon. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the S6200 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR700 was unveiled 18 months later than the S6200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-ZR700 grades versus the S6200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S6200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Nikon Coolpix S6200. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Nikon S6200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Nikon S6200
| EX-ZR700 | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | August 2011 | Fresher by 18 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| S6200 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon S6200
| EX-ZR700 | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S6200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Nikon S6200 has dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon S6200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the S6200.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and S6200 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S6200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out specifications. The graphic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and S6200.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of files although you may want to take the age of the cameras into account. The more recent EX-ZR700 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S6200 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S6200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S6200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-08-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | 250 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $370 | $229 |