Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9300
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched July 2012
- Replaced the Nikon S9100
- Updated by Nikon S9500

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9300 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the S9300 (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR700 was unveiled 7 months after the S9300 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-ZR700 grades against the S9300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Nikon Coolpix S9300. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Nikon S9300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Nikon S9300
EX-ZR700 | S9300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2012 | Newer by 7 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Casio EX-ZR700
S9300 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon S9300
EX-ZR700 | S9300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 comes with physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Nikon S9300 has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the S9300.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and S9300 is 91 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The pic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and S9300.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you might want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The younger EX-ZR700 will have an advantage in sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9300 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon S9300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2012-07-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 6.9fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 215g (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 200 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $370 | $249 |