Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-11
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-11 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-11, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the SZ-11 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR700 was introduced 19 months after the SZ-11 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-ZR700 grades versus the SZ-11 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-11 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus SZ-11. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus SZ-11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus SZ-11
| EX-ZR700 | SZ-11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | July 2011 | Newer by 19 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| SZ-11 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus SZ-11
| EX-ZR700 | SZ-11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-11 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR700 enjoys outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-11 has sizing of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-11 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR700 compared to the SZ-11.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and SZ-11 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-11 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out specs. The picture below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and SZ-11.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR700 to produce greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SZ-11 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus SZ-11 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus SZ-11 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2011-07-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 200 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $370 | $253 |