Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 9000
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 9000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR700 was introduced 3 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR700 grades against the 9000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus 9000
| EX-ZR700 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 46 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| 9000 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus 9000
| EX-ZR700 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 comes with exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 9000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the 9000.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and 9000 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and 9000.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to produce more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju 9000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 225g (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $370 | $300 |