Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SH-3
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SH-3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is very close and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR700 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the SH-3 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-ZR700 grades against the SH-3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus SH-3
| EX-ZR700 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| SH-3 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 36 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus SH-3
| EX-ZR700 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has got exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SH-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the SH-3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and SH-3 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and SH-3.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of files however you have to factor the age of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR700 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Portrait photography with Olympus SH-3
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
megapixel count decent (16MP)
offers face detect focus
delivers RAW files
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Street photography with Olympus SH-3
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
boasts touch focus
lighter than competition (271g)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Sports photography camera
great zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
great battery life (470 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
offers tracking focus
great battery life (380 CIPA)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Travel photography with Olympus SH-3
great battery life (470 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (222g)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
great battery life (380 per charge)
lighter than competition (271 grams)
boasts touch focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography advice
Olympus SH-3 Landscape photography advice
has manual focus
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
great battery life (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (380 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging highlights
Olympus SH-3 Vlogging highlights
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone socket
really wide (25mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
lighter than competition (271g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone port
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2016-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 11.5fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 271 gr (0.60 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 380 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $370 | $579 |