Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
69 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Updated by Olympus SP-820UZ
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus SP-820UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR700 was manufactured 6 months later than the SP-820UZ which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR700 scores against the SP-820UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| EX-ZR700 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Casio EX-ZR700
| SP-820UZ | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus SP-820UZ
| EX-ZR700 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | August 2012 | Same age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR700 has exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-820UZ has sizing of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus SP-820UZ in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the SP-820UZ.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and SP-820UZ is 91 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and SP-820UZ.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR700 to show extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.4-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 15.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 485 gr (1.07 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $370 | $299 |