Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 6010
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 6010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 6010 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus 6010, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and 6010 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR700 was revealed 3 years later than the 6010 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-ZR700 grades vs the 6010 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 6010 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6010. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus 6010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus 6010
| EX-ZR700 | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 44 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| 6010 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus 6010
| EX-ZR700 | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 6010 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus 6010 has dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus 6010 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the 6010.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and 6010 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 6010 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The visual underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and 6010.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR700 to deliver extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 6010 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus 6010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 6010 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 179 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50C |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $370 | $0 |