Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus XZ-10
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus XZ-10, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR700 was manufactured about the same time to the XZ-10 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR700 grades versus the XZ-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus XZ-10
| EX-ZR700 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Sharper display (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| XZ-10 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus XZ-10
| EX-ZR700 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR700 enjoys outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus XZ-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the XZ-10.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and XZ-10 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specs. The picture below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and XZ-10.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR700 to give more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography advice
Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography advice
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
manual focus
offers face detect focus
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Street photography highlights
Olympus XZ-10 Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (222 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition in class (221 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-10
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides tracking focus
good battery power (470 CIPA)
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
max fps very slow (5.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Travel photography highlights
Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography highlights
good battery power (470 CIPA)
lighter than competitors in class (222g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (221 grams)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography information
Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography information
has manual focus
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
good battery power (470 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse mode
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging information
Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging information
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (222 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of mic socket
rather wide (26mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no mic jack
heavier than competition in class (221g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | 240 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $370 | $428 |