Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR700 was introduced very close to the TG-630 iHS which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR700 matches up versus the TG-630 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
EX-ZR700 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR700
TG-630 iHS | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
EX-ZR700 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Similar age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 enjoys outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-630 iHS has proportions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the TG-630 iHS.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and TG-630 iHS is 91 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The visual below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and TG-630 iHS.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR700 to offer more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 922k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | 220 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $370 | $200 |