Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is very close and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR700 was launched 14 months earlier than the TG-3 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR700 scores vs the TG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus TG-3
EX-ZR700 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Casio EX-ZR700
TG-3 | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | January 2013 | Fresher by 14 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-3
EX-ZR700 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 has external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the TG-3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and TG-3 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and TG-3.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of images though you will need to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR700 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2014-03-31 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 330 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $370 | $350 |