Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is very close and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR700 was launched 14 months earlier than the TG-3 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR700 scores vs the TG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus TG-3
| EX-ZR700 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| TG-3 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 14 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-3
| EX-ZR700 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 has external dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the TG-3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and TG-3 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and TG-3.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of images though you will need to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR700 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
megapixel count decent (16MP)
features face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Street photography details
Olympus TG-3 Street photography details
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (222 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competitors (247g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-3 Sports photography factors
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
features tracking focus
better than average battery life (470 CIPA)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
weather sealing
great battery power (330 per charge)
max frames per second low (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery life (470 shots)
lighter than average (222g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long zoom (450mm)
lack of Timelapse function
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
great battery power (330 per charge)
weather sealing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-3
has manual focus
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
better than average battery life (470 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
weather sealing
great battery power (330 per charge)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-3 Vlogging details
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (222g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone support
pretty wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than competitors (247g)
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 247 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | 330 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $370 | $350 |
