Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus TG-4, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR700 was announced 3 years earlier than the TG-4 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the TG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus TG-4
| EX-ZR700 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| TG-4 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 26 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-4
| EX-ZR700 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 provides exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the TG-4.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and TG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and TG-4.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of files but you need to take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR700 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Street photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Street photography advice
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (222 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Sports photography with Olympus TG-4
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
good battery (380 CIPA)
low fps (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Travel photography with Olympus TG-4
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
lighter than others in class (222 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
good battery (380 shots)
environment sealing
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography information
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography information
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
better than average battery power (470 shots)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
good battery (380 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging advice
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (222 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 380 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $370 | $379 |
