Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus TG-4, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR700 was announced 3 years earlier than the TG-4 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the TG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus TG-4
EX-ZR700 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Casio EX-ZR700
TG-4 | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2015 | January 2013 | Newer by 26 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-4
EX-ZR700 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 provides exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the TG-4.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and TG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and TG-4.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of files but you need to take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR700 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 380 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $370 | $379 |