Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-5
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2017
- Superseded the Olympus TG-4
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-6
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and TG-5 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR700 was manufactured 5 years before the TG-5 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the TG-5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus Tough TG-5. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus TG-5
| EX-ZR700 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| TG-5 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 52 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-5
| EX-ZR700 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 has outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus TG-5 has dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the TG-5.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and TG-5 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The visual underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and TG-5.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR700 to render extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-ZR700 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-5 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
has face detection focus
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
you can focus manually
has face detect focus
saves RAW files
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Street photography with Olympus TG-5
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (222 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
environment proof
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than competition in class (250 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-5 Sports photography factors
amazing zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
good battery (470 shots)
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
high fps (20.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
environment proof
better than average battery (340 CIPA)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Travel photography with Olympus TG-5
good battery (470 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (222 grams)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery (340 shots)
environment proof
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competition in class (250 grams)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-5
has manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
good battery (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
environment proof
better than average battery (340 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-5 Vlogging details
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (222g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic support
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
missing mic support
heavier than competition in class (250 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2017-05-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 20.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 250 grams (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 340 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $370 | $449 |