Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR700 was manufactured 19 months later than the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR700 grades vs the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus VR-320
EX-ZR700 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | July 2011 | Fresher by 19 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-ZR700
VR-320 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus VR-320
EX-ZR700 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 provides outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the VR-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The graphic below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and VR-320.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to render greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $370 | $179 |