Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-340
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus VR-340, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR700 was revealed 13 months after the VR-340 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the VR-340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus VR-340
EX-ZR700 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | January 2012 | More modern by 13 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Casio EX-ZR700
VR-340 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus VR-340
EX-ZR700 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 features physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus VR-340 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR700 and the VR-340.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and VR-340 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The pic below should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and VR-340.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of files although you should always take the age of the cameras into account. The newer EX-ZR700 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus VR-340 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $370 | $130 |